Campaign Reporters Fess Up: They Really Can’t Stand Hillary Clinton

Mother Jones

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd”>

Last month Politico polled 80 campaign reporters about this year’s race. It turns out they hate Nevada and Ohio but love South Carolina—mainly because it has good food, apparently. They think Maggie Haberman is the best reporter covering the race, and Fox News has done the best job of hosting a debate. Donald Trump has gotten the softest coverage, probably because they all agree that “traffic, viewership, and clicks” drives their coverage.

And who’s gotten the harshest coverage? Do you even have to ask? It turns out that even reporters themselves agree that it’s not even a close call:

Link:  

Campaign Reporters Fess Up: They Really Can’t Stand Hillary Clinton

This entry was posted in FF, GE, LG, ONA, Uncategorized, Venta and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.